Ipamorelin in brief
Ipamorelin is a synthetic pentapeptide amide, Aib-His-D-2-Nal-D-Phe-Lys-NH2 (711.9 g/mol), published in 1998 as NNC 26-0161 and an agonist at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Three of its five positions are non-proteinogenic, and it reaches the receptor without the fatty-acid group ghrelin requires. It released growth hormone from rat pituitary cells with a half-maximal concentration of 1.3 nmol/l and, unlike GHRP-6 and GHRP-2, did not raise corticotropin or cortisol in swine, which is the whole basis of its selectivity reputation. No affinity constant and no conformational measurement have been published. Development stopped at a phase 2 trial in postoperative ileus that reported no difference from placebo, and the FDA places it in category 2 of its bulk-substance safety list, citing serious adverse events including death identified in that same trial. Two laboratories have found a glycine-extended analogue in preparations sold under this name.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
Ipamorelin regulatory status
No marketing authorisation for ipamorelin was found in Drugs@FDA (queried through openFDA), the EMA medicines database or the Health Canada Drug Product Database (searched November 2026), and the highest phase registered on ClinicalTrials.gov is phase 2, in postoperative ileus and gastrointestinal dysmotility; the postoperative ileus trial, NCT00672074, was sponsored by Helsinn Therapeutics (U.S.) and is recorded as completed. The 2026 WADA Prohibited List names ipamorelin among the growth hormone secretagogues in class S2.2.4, prohibited at all times. The FDA places ipamorelin acetate in category 2 under the 503B interim policy, its list of bulk substances that may present significant safety risks, citing possible immunogenicity from aggregation or peptide-related impurities, the added difficulty of characterising its unnatural amino acids, and serious adverse events including death identified in a published study of ipamorelin for gastric motility; the same page also lists it among nominations withdrawn by their nominators (page current as of 22 April 2026). The study the agency links to is that phase 2 trial, whose own abstract concludes the compound was well tolerated.[8,9,10,11,12,13,5,4]
Ipamorelin at a glance
- A pentapeptide amide of 711.9 g/mol, C38H49N9O5, written Aib-His-D-2-Nal-D-Phe-Lys-NH2. Three of the five positions are outside the ordinary proteinogenic set: an achiral 2-aminoisobutyric acid cap, a D-naphthylalanine and a D-phenylalanine. No cysteine, no disulfide, no acyl chain, no metal.[1,2]
- Reported in 1998 from a Novo Nordisk chemistry programme, as compound NNC 26-0161. It released growth hormone from primary rat pituitary cells with a half-maximal concentration of 1.3 nmol/l and a maximum 85 percent of that of GHRP-6, and the response was blocked by a secretagogue antagonist rather than by a growth hormone-releasing hormone antagonist.[1]
- The one human kinetic dataset located is from 1999, in healthy male volunteers at five escalating exposure levels, eight men at each. It modelled dose-proportional kinetics with a terminal half-life of about 2 hours, a clearance of 0.078 L/h/kg and a steady-state volume of distribution of 0.22 L/kg, and a half-maximal stimulating concentration of 214 nmol/L, with growth hormone rising as a single episode peaking at 0.67 hours.[14]
- The receptor it was profiled against was cloned in 1996 and its endogenous ligand was identified in 1999 as ghrelin, a 28-residue peptide whose activity requires an n-octanoyl group on serine 3. Ipamorelin reaches the same receptor with no acyl group at all, which is the structural question the molecule poses.[15,3,1]
- It is a scaffold as much as a compound. Published chemistry names it as the lead that NN703, the 3-(aminomethyl)benzoyl tetrapeptides, the constrained-amine series and the NN703 hybrids were derived from, and two later groups built positron-emission tomography probes and boron-cluster conjugates on its backbone.[16,17,18,19,20,21]
- Two laboratories independently identified Gly-ipamorelin, the same chain extended by one N-terminal glycine, in preparations labelled as growth hormone secretagogues. One confirmed the assignment against custom-synthesised material. A label naming this pentapeptide is a claim about a five-residue molecule and has been found to be wrong.[6,22]
- Status and evidence base, in one place. There is no marketing authorisation anywhere, development stopped at a phase 2 trial that reported no difference from placebo, the compound is prohibited in sport at all times, and the FDA places it in category 2 of its bulk-substance safety list citing serious adverse events including death in that same trial. What exists as evidence: two human studies, a kinetic one and that trial; animal work in rats, mice, swine, ferret and fish; cell and cell-free work; and no receptor binding constant and no structure of any kind.[8,4,13,5,14,7]
What is Ipamorelin?
Ipamorelin is a five-residue synthetic peptide that activates the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. The receptor came first: it was cloned from swine and human pituitary and hypothalamus in 1996 and shown to be the target of synthetic secretagogues, with its discoverers noting that its existence implied an undiscovered hormone. That hormone was purified from rat stomach three years later and named ghrelin, a 28-residue peptide carrying an n-octanoyl ester on serine 3 without which it does not act.[15,3]
The compound was published in 1998 as the outcome of a chemistry programme, under the code NNC 26-0161. Its authors describe reaching it within a series of compounds from which the central Ala-Trp dipeptide of the earlier growth hormone-releasing peptides had been removed, which is why it carries five residues where GHRP-6 carries six and why it does not contain the Ala-Trp-(D-Phe)-Lys core that analytical work treats as this family common motif.[1,16,23]
Its position in the literature is unusual for a peptide of this size. Four papers from the same programme describe it chiefly as a starting point: one series shrank it towards gastrointestinal absorption by replacing residues with a 3-(aminomethyl)benzoic acid fragment and N-methylating the backbone, another added constrained amines at the C-terminus after comparing it with NN703, and a third made hybrids of the two. Two unrelated groups later reused the backbone, for fluorine-18 imaging probes and for carborane conjugates. More published chemistry exists on molecules derived from ipamorelin than on ipamorelin itself.[17,16,18,19,20,21]
Development reached a phase 2 trial in postoperative ileus, registered as NCT00672074 and reported in 2014, which stated no significant difference from placebo on its key or secondary efficacy analyses. That is cited here as the furthest point the molecule reached and for no other purpose. The names most often confused with it belong to a different receptor family: sermorelin, tesamorelin and the CJC-1295 forms act at the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor, and in the 1998 work an antagonist of that receptor did not block what ipamorelin did to pituitary cells.[4,1]
Its status is settled, and it is a stopped programme rather than an unexplored molecule. No marketing authorisation exists in Drugs@FDA, the European Medicines Agency medicines database or the Health Canada Drug Product Database. The furthest it reached was a phase 2 proof-of-concept trial in postoperative ileus after bowel resection, sponsored by Helsinn Therapeutics (U.S.) and registered as NCT00672074, which enrolled 117 patients between 2008 and 2009 and reported no significant difference from placebo on its key or secondary efficacy analyses. The 2026 World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List names it among the growth hormone secretagogues in class S2.2.4, prohibited at all times. And the FDA places ipamorelin acetate in category 2 of its list of bulk substances that may present significant safety risks, where the stated concern includes serious adverse events including death identified in that trial. The two readings of the same study do not agree and a reader should have both: the paper's own abstract concludes the compound was well tolerated and reports treatment-emergent adverse events in 87.5 percent of the ipamorelin group against 94.8 percent on placebo, while the agency, with the fuller record in front of it, names the harder finding.[8,9,10,11,4,13,5]
Not to be confused with
- Ghrelin
- The endogenous ligand of the same receptor, and a different kind of molecule. Ghrelin is 28 residues with an n-octanoyl group esterified to serine 3, and that acyl group is required for its activity. Ipamorelin is five residues with no acyl group anywhere. The two reach the same receptor by different chemistry, which is the single most useful fact for telling them apart.[3,1,25]
- GHRP-6, GHRP-2, GHRP-1 and hexarelin
- Separate synthetic secretagogues of the same family, resolved as distinct analytes alongside ipamorelin in analytical work. They share a core written as Ala-Trp-(D-Phe)-Lys; ipamorelin was identified within a series that had the central Ala-Trp dipeptide removed, so it does not carry that core. In swine, GHRP-6 and GHRP-2 each raised plasma corticotropin and cortisol where ipamorelin did not.[23,16,1,42]
- NN703, and the hybrid and peptidomimetic series built from this scaffold
- Later molecules whose published descriptions name ipamorelin as the lead they were derived from, by shrinking it and reducing hydrogen-bonding sites. NN703, the 3-(aminomethyl)benzoyl tetrapeptides, the constrained-amine analogues and the NN703-ipamorelin hybrids are each their own compound. A measurement made on one of them is not a measurement of ipamorelin.[17,16,37,18,19]
- Anamorelin, macimorelin and an orally active, non-peptide ghrelin-receptor agonist
- Three further agonists at the same receptor, each with a deposited receptor-bound structure that ipamorelin does not have. On isolated ferret ileum the comparison was measured directly: anamorelin inhibited stimulated contractions by 94.4 percent and ipamorelin by 54.4 percent, at similar micromolar half-maximal concentrations.[28,7]
- Gly-ipamorelin
- Not a synonym but a different molecule, the pentapeptide extended by one glycine at the N-terminus. Two laboratories independently identified it in preparations labelled as growth hormone secretagogues, one confirming the assignment against custom-synthesised reference material. It is six residues rather than five and its mass is higher by one glycine.[6,22]
- Sermorelin, tesamorelin and the CJC-1295 forms
- Peptides acting at the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor, a class B1 receptor unrelated to this one. The distinction is not nominal: in the discovery work, a growth hormone-releasing hormone antagonist did not block what ipamorelin did to pituitary cells, while a secretagogue antagonist did.[1,37]
- Growth hormone (somatropin)
- A 191-residue protein, not a peptide of this size or class. The difference has been measured rather than merely asserted: in growth hormone-deficient lit/lit mice, ipamorelin raised relative fat mass while growth hormone itself lowered it, and the secretagogues raised serum leptin and food intake where growth hormone did not.[30]
Ipamorelin structure and sequence
The graph is short and almost every position in it is deliberate. Position 1 is 2-aminoisobutyric acid, an alpha carbon bearing two methyl groups, which makes the residue achiral and restricts the backbone angles available to it. Position 2 is L-histidine. Position 3 is D-alanine carrying a 2-naphthyl side chain, a fused bicyclic aromatic twice the size of a phenyl ring. Position 4 is D-phenylalanine. Position 5 is L-lysine whose C-terminal carboxylate has been replaced by a primary amide, leaving the side-chain amine free. Reading the registry stereodescriptors in order gives achiral, 2S, 2R, 2R, 2S.[2,1]
Two of those features can be tied to measurements on neighbouring molecules rather than asserted. The adjacent D-residue pair at positions 3 and 4 is the arrangement that appeared when ghrelin was shortened from the other direction: replacing the third and fourth residues of a truncated ghrelin analogue with D-isomers was read by its authors as shaping the active geometry, with the N-terminal dipeptide acting as a spacer. The C-terminal end was tested by removal and restoration: a programme that stripped C-terminal pharmacophores out of this scaffold to improve gastrointestinal absorption found that putting a lysine mimetic and a naphthyl or biphenyl core back produced unexpectedly potent compounds, and a separate series added polar constrained amines there because comparing ipamorelin with NN703 suggested one was needed.[24,19,18]
There is no three-dimensional view on this page and the reason is not a shortage of searching. The Protein Data Bank holds receptor-bound structures for ghrelin, GHRP-6, anamorelin, macimorelin and an orally active, non-peptide ghrelin-receptor agonist, and none for this molecule; PubChem holds no calculated conformer for it either, and no spectroscopic study of its solution shape was found. What the deposited structures establish bears on it only indirectly: they identify a pocket that accepts the octanoyl group of ghrelin and positions the peptide for activation, and they name a salt bridge and an aromatic cluster near the agonist site as recurring activation motifs. Ipamorelin has no acyl group to place in that pocket, and carries two bulky aromatic side chains in a four-bond span. How those are accommodated is an open structural question, not a described one.[7,2,25,26,3]
Modifications
- 1 The N-terminal residue is 2-aminoisobutyric acid, not alanine. Its alpha carbon carries two methyl groups and no hydrogen, so the residue is achiral and its backbone is conformationally restricted. The free alpha-amino group remains, which is the group a glycine extension would acylate.[1,2,6]
- 3 3-(2-naphthyl)-D-alanine: a D-residue whose side chain is a fused bicyclic aromatic system rather than the single ring of phenylalanine. Both the D configuration and the naphthalene are structural features the later chemistry treated as potency-bearing, since reintroducing a naphthylalanine core into stripped-down analogues raised potency again.[1,2,19]
- 4 D-phenylalanine. The adjacent D-residue pair at 3 and 4 is the feature shared with the shortened ghrelin analogues, where replacing the corresponding two residues with D-isomers was read as shaping the biologically active geometry.[1,24,2]
- 5 C-terminal lysinamide: the terminal carboxylate is replaced by a primary amide, leaving the lysine side-chain amine free. This amide is an enzymatic target, since a study of this peptide class found metabolites formed by amidase action alongside exopeptidase and endopeptidase products.[2,31,18]
Four of the five residues carry a defined configuration and the fifth has none. Reading the registry string residue by residue: the quaternary aminoisobutyric acid at position 1 is achiral, histidine 2 is 2S, the naphthylalanine at 3 is 2R, the phenylalanine at 4 is 2R, and lysine 5 is 2S. In the usual amino-acid convention that is L, D, D, L for positions 2 to 5. There is no cysteine, so no disulfide; no cyclisation, no lipid arm, no linker, no polyethylene glycol, no glycosylation and no metal coordination. The molecule carries no net charge in the registry record and has 19 rotatable bonds, which for a chain this short is a large fraction of its own skeleton.[2,1]
What studies on Ipamorelin show
Each card names the experimental system and what was measured. A result in one system is not evidence about another.
Cell-based secretion assay with antagonist profiling, plus measurements in two species · Primary rat pituitary cell culture; pentobarbital-anaesthetised rats; conscious swine
Ipamorelin released growth hormone from primary rat pituitary cells with a half-maximal concentration of 1.3 plus or minus 0.4 nmol/l and a maximum of 85 plus or minus 5 percent of the GHRP-6 maximum, against 2.2 plus or minus 0.3 nmol/l for GHRP-6 itself. Antagonist profiling placed the action at a secretagogue-type receptor rather than the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor. In swine none of the secretagogues tested changed follitropin, lutropin, prolactin or thyrotropin; GHRP-6 and GHRP-2 each raised plasma corticotropin and cortisol, and ipamorelin did not do so at concentrations the authors describe as more than 200-fold above its half-maximal point for growth hormone release.[1]
- Material
- Ipamorelin, Aib-His-D-2-Nal-D-Phe-Lys-NH2, coded NNC 26-0161
- Measured
- Growth hormone released into the medium or into plasma, as a concentration-response relationship; plasma follitropin, lutropin, prolactin, thyrotropin, corticotropin and cortisol in swine; the effect of each antagonist on the response
- Compared with
- GHRP-6 and GHRP-2; growth hormone-releasing hormone; antagonists of both the secretagogue and the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptors
- Limitation
- A secretion assay, so the figures are potencies and not receptor affinities, and no binding constant was measured here or anywhere since. The hormone panel was measured in swine and covers pituitary hormones only, not a receptor screen. The work is from the company that developed the compound, and the comparison with GHRP-6 is relative throughout.
Raun K et al., 1998, European Journal of Endocrinology
Primary cell culture with simultaneous secretion and transcript measurement · Pituitary cells in primary culture from the black seabream Acanthopagrus schlegeli
Ipamorelin produced a concentration-dependent rise in secreted growth hormone with a half-maximal concentration in the nanomolar range, while the messenger RNA level did not change at any time point up to 48 hours. Human ghrelin was the one agent tested that did not raise secretion in this system. The authors conclude the secretion is independent of transcription of the gene, in contrast to what had been reported in rat.[27]
- Material
- Ipamorelin, beside GHRP-2, human ghrelin, the benzolactam L692,585 and the spiropiperidine L163,540
- Measured
- Growth hormone secreted into the medium by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and growth hormone messenger RNA in the same cells by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, with stimulation extended to 48 hours
- Compared with
- The four other secretagogues, and unstimulated cells
- Limitation
- Fish pituitary cells, and the per-compound half-maximal values are not itemised in the accessible abstract. The negative result on messenger RNA is a statement about this preparation and this time window; it does not establish what happens to the transcript in any other species or over longer stimulation.
Chan CB et al., 2004, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology
Isolated tissue contractility with electrical field stimulation · Isolated ferret ileum segments in an organ bath
Ipamorelin inhibited stimulated contractions of isolated ferret ileum by 54.4 percent with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 11.7 micromolar, while anamorelin reached 94.4 percent at 14.0 micromolar. The two concentrations are close and the maximum inhibitions are not, which separates potency from efficacy in this tissue.[28]
- Material
- Ipamorelin; anamorelin as the comparator agonist
- Measured
- Inhibition of electrical field stimulation-induced contractions, as a maximum percentage inhibition and a half-maximal inhibitory concentration
- Compared with
- Anamorelin, and vehicle
- Limitation
- Ferret tissue, and a micromolar concentration range three orders above the nanomolar pituitary figure, so the two numbers describe different systems and should not be read as one potency for the molecule. No receptor antagonist was applied in this arm, so the inhibition is not shown here to be receptor-mediated. The whole-animal part of this study is outside what is reported on this page.
Lu Z et al., 2024, Physiology & Behavior
In vivo response measurement with a receptor antagonist as the control · Rat, colorectal distension visceromotor response and von Frey paw withdrawal, with no active colonic inflammation
Both agonists changed the measured responses relative to vehicle, and both effects were abolished by the ghrelin receptor antagonist H0900. This is the one experiment located in which an effect of ipamorelin itself is shown to depend on that receptor by pharmacological blockade.[29]
- Material
- Ipamorelin, described by the authors as peripherally restricted; HM01 as a globally active agonist
- Measured
- Abdominal contraction counts across graded distension pressures, and ipsilateral paw withdrawal counts; the same endpoints in the presence of the antagonist
- Compared with
- Vehicle, and the ghrelin receptor antagonist H0900 given against both agonists
- Limitation
- Rat, and the endpoints are organism-level responses rather than a receptor measurement, so the antagonist result establishes receptor dependence and nothing about affinity or binding site. Industry-funded with the interest disclosed. The peripherally restricted description is the authors characterisation and no distribution data supporting it appears in the abstract.
N Mohammadi E et al., 2020, Journal of Experimental Pharmacology
Genetic separation of receptor action from downstream hormone action · Growth hormone-deficient lit/lit mice and growth hormone-intact +/lit and +/+ mice; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, serum leptin, food intake
Relative fat mass rose with either secretagogue in growth hormone-intact mice and with ipamorelin in growth hormone-deficient lit/lit mice, where growth hormone itself lowered it. Serum leptin and food intake rose with the secretagogues and not with growth hormone. Since the lit/lit animals cannot mount a growth hormone response, the authors read part of the secretagogue effect as independent of growth hormone.[30]
- Material
- Ipamorelin and GHRP-6
- Measured
- Body weight, fat pad weight relative to body weight, relative fat mass by absorptiometry, serum leptin, food intake
- Compared with
- Growth hormone itself, in the same animals and the same assays
- Limitation
- Mouse endpoints. The design shows that an effect survives growth hormone deficiency; it does not identify what mediates it, and this page reports it only as the measured divergence between a secretagogue and the hormone.
Lall S et al., 2001, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Metabolite identification by high-resolution mass spectrometry, in vivo and in vitro · Rat urine after administration; human serum and recombinant amidase in vitro; ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with Orbitrap and quadrupole time-of-flight detection
28 metabolites were identified across the eight peptides, at least three for each, and every one arose from exopeptidase, amidase or endopeptidase activity. The amidase route is the structurally specific finding for this class: the C-terminal amide, which in ipamorelin sits on lysine 5, is itself an enzymatic target rather than an inert cap.[31]
- Material
- Ipamorelin, with GHRP-1, -2, -4, -5, -6, hexarelin and alexamorelin in the same study
- Measured
- Identity of urinary metabolites by full-scan screening and high-accuracy product ion scans, with main metabolites confirmed in the human in vitro model
- Compared with
- The other seven peptides; two deuterium-labelled internal standards
- Limitation
- Abstract-level reading, and the ipamorelin metabolites are not itemised there, so the amidase result is reported for the class rather than as a named ipamorelin product. The in vivo arm is rat; only the main metabolites were checked against human material in vitro.
Thomas A et al., 2012, Analytical Chemistry
Human excretion study with nano-liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry · Human urine collected over two days, one volunteer per compound
Ipamorelin was excreted as parent compound together with a set of metabolites, and one is named: ipamorelin (1-4) free acid, which is the chain minus its C-terminal lysinamide, detected in urine after the parent had cleared. The authors describe ipamorelin as metabolising intensively and conclude that the detection window depends on individual metabolism and on preparation.[32]
- Material
- Ipamorelin, with GHRP-1, GHRP-2, GHRP-6 and hexarelin
- Measured
- Identity and time course of parent compound and metabolites in urine, with calibration curves and excretion curves plotted
- Compared with
- The other four peptides, each in its own volunteer
- Limitation
- One volunteer per compound, so between-person variation is uncontrolled, which the authors state. An excretion study identifies what leaves the body and in what order; it says nothing about whether the named fragment is active, and no study comparing the fragment against the parent at the receptor was found.
Semenistaya E et al., 2015, Drug Testing and Analysis
Structural characterisation of market-sourced material by mass spectrometry with synthetic confirmation · Preparations sold as growth-promoting products, analysed by top-down and bottom-up liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry
Three glycine-extended analogues were identified, each the labelled peptide carrying one additional glycine at the N-terminus, and the identity of Gly-ipamorelin was confirmed against synthesised material rather than inferred from mass alone. A separate growth hormone variant of 192 residues, one alanine longer than the 191-residue form, was found in the same set. A second laboratory reported the same class of glycine extension in independently seized powders a year later.[6]
- Material
- Material labelled as growth hormone secretagogues; the assigned structures Gly-ipamorelin, Gly-GHRP-6 and Gly-GHRP-2
- Measured
- Molecular mass and fragmentation of the peptides present, compared against reference material
- Compared with
- Custom-synthesised Gly-ipamorelin and Gly-GHRP-2 as reference standards; the 22 kDa growth hormone isoform against a 192-residue variant found in the same study
- Limitation
- These are analyses of particular samples and carry no frequency: nothing in them says how often the substitution occurs, and nothing says anything about any specific present-day material. No study was found comparing ipamorelin against Gly-ipamorelin at the receptor, so what the extra residue does pharmacologically is unestablished.
Krug O et al., 2018, Growth Hormone & IGF Research
Human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study with population modelling · Healthy male volunteers, eight at each of five escalating exposure levels
Kinetics were dose-proportional, with a terminal half-life of 2 hours, a clearance of 0.078 L/h/kg and a steady-state volume of distribution of 0.22 L/kg. Growth hormone rose as a single episode peaking at 0.67 hours and declining exponentially to negligible concentrations at every level tested. The modelled concentration for half-maximal growth hormone stimulation was 214 nmol/L with a maximal production rate of 694 mIU/L/h, and between-person variability was larger in the pharmacodynamic parameters than in the kinetic ones.[14]
- Material
- Ipamorelin
- Measured
- Plasma concentrations of ipamorelin and of growth hormone over time, fitted to an indirect response model with population estimation
- Compared with
- The five exposure levels against one another; no active comparator and no placebo arm
- Limitation
- Abstract level, and the only human kinetic data on the molecule. Healthy young men only, so neither sex nor age is represented, and the endpoint is a hormone concentration rather than any outcome. The 214 nmol/L for half-maximal stimulation sits more than two orders of magnitude above the 1.3 nmol/l potency in rat pituitary cells, which is a measure of how far apart an isolated-cell potency and a whole-body concentration-response can be for one molecule.
Gobburu JV et al., 1999, Pharmaceutical Research
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 2 proof-of-concept trial · Adults undergoing open or laparoscopic small and large bowel resection, as hospital inpatients; 117 enrolled, 114 in the safety and modified intent-to-treat populations
Median time to the first tolerated meal was 25.3 hours with ipamorelin and 32.6 hours with placebo, p equal to 0.15, and the paper reports no significant difference from placebo on the key or any secondary efficacy analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events of any kind occurred in 87.5 percent of the ipamorelin group and 94.8 percent of the placebo group, and the authors conclude the compound was well tolerated.[4]
- Material
- Ipamorelin against placebo, over up to seven days after surgery or until discharge
- Measured
- Time from the first administration to tolerance of a standardised solid meal as the key efficacy endpoint, with adverse events and laboratory tests for safety
- Compared with
- Placebo
- Limitation
- Read at abstract level. The authors call the study small and note a broad range of underlying conditions among the patients. The safety conclusion is not the last word on the record: the FDA cites this same study as identifying serious adverse events including death, which the abstract does not report, so a reader who stops at the paper's own conclusion has the more favourable half of it. This is the only efficacy trial the molecule has, and it is negative.
Beck DE et al., 2014, International Journal of Colorectal Disease
What is established about ipamorelin at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, and what is inferred from its neighbours
The receptor is a 366-residue class A G protein-coupled receptor, curated as coupling to Gq and producing diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, and as binding growth hormone releasing peptides including GHRP-6 as well as orally active non-peptide secretagogues. It is the receptor the 1998 work profiled ipamorelin against by antagonist exclusion, and the receptor whose antagonist abolished the measured responses to ipamorelin in the 2020 rat study. Those two experiments are the direct evidence that this molecule acts there; a radio-competitive binding assay at the same receptor did include ipamorelin, without an affinity figure in the accessible abstract.[33,1,29,23]
What the structural work adds is a comparison rather than a picture. Cryo-electron microscopy of the receptor bound to ghrelin and to GHRP-6 identifies a pocket that receives the octanoyl group of ghrelin and guides the peptide into the activating position, and a second study with ghrelin and an orally active, non-peptide ghrelin-receptor agonist names a salt bridge and an aromatic cluster near the agonist site as motifs recurring across its agonists. Ghrelin loses activity without that acyl group. Ipamorelin never had one, and carries instead a naphthylalanine and a phenylalanine on adjacent D-residues, a plausible but untested candidate for engaging that aromatic cluster. No deposited structure contains this molecule, so the reading is inference from neighbours rather than a described binding mode.[25,26,3,7]
Two observations complicate a single-site account, and both were made on relatives rather than on this compound. Radiolabelled NN703 and GHRP-6 accumulated substantially in the glandular stomach of the rat, and resecting the gastrointestinal tract reduced the growth hormone response to GHRP-6 by 60 to 70 percent while leaving the growth hormone-releasing hormone response intact, which the authors read as a second indirect route. Separately, an experiment in growth hormone-deficient mice found that part of what ipamorelin changed did not require growth hormone at all. The molecule has also been measured on tissue far from the pituitary: it reversed the inhibition of acetylcholine-induced and electrically stimulated contraction in isolated rat gastric fundus, and raised insulin release from isolated rat pancreatic fragments in a way reduced by calcium-channel and adrenergic blockers. Neither has been followed up structurally.[34,30,35,36,33]

What is still unknown about Ipamorelin
There is no measured affinity for this molecule at its own receptor, which is the largest gap on the page. The 1998 half-maximal concentration of 1.3 nmol/l is a secretion potency in a pituitary cell preparation, and the same programme showed why the two must not be conflated: when NN703 was tested both ways, the inhibition constant from radioligand displacement at the human receptor did not match what its potency in rat pituitary cells predicted, and its potency on receptor-driven inositol phosphate turnover in those cells was lower than in rat pituitary cells. A radio-competitive assay at the receptor did include ipamorelin, without an itemised figure for it in the accessible abstract. So the compound best known for selectivity in this class has no published binding constant.[1,37,23]
The selectivity claim is narrower than its reputation. What was measured was a panel of six pituitary hormones in conscious swine: follitropin, lutropin, prolactin and thyrotropin were unchanged by any secretagogue tested, and corticotropin and cortisol rose with GHRP-6 and GHRP-2 and not with ipamorelin at concentrations the authors describe as more than 200-fold above its half-maximal point for growth hormone release. That is a real negative result about six hormones in one species, and not a receptor screen. No broader off-target profiling was located, so the word selective in the original title describes the hormone panel rather than a surveyed receptorome.[1]
Nothing experimental is known about the shape of the molecule. There is no deposited structure, no computed conformer in PubChem, and no circular dichroism or nuclear magnetic resonance study of the free peptide. Five residues with 19 rotatable bonds and a conformationally restricting aminoisobutyric acid cap is precisely the case where a measurement would decide something, and the structural literature on the receptor has accumulated instead around ghrelin, GHRP-6, anamorelin, macimorelin and an orally active, non-peptide ghrelin-receptor agonist.[7,2,25,26]
Separately from that, much of the tissue-level work is unreplicated, and its most careful results are the negatives inside it. A bone study found mineral content raised by absorptiometry while volumetric density was unchanged by three independent methods. A rat pituitary culture study found secretion granule density raised with no change in the proportion of somatotroph cells. Neither has a second laboratory behind it, and in both the headline measurement and the controlling measurement point different ways, which is the pattern to look for when reading the rest of this literature.[38,39]
The form in circulation is not fixed by the name. Three separate registry entries exist under acetate naming, with one, two and three acetates and masses of 771.9, 832.0 and 892.0 g/mol against 711.9 for the free peptide, and at least one published study specifies ipamorelin acetate as its material. Independently of salt form, two laboratories identified Gly-ipamorelin, a six-residue analogue, in preparations labelled as secretagogues. The analytical means to tell these apart exist: the intact pentapeptide is detectable in urine at 0.2 to 1 ng/mL by validated methods, and the fragment ipamorelin (1-4) free acid has been characterised. What does not exist is any study of what the glycine extension does at the receptor.[40,41,6,22,42,32]
Key papers on Ipamorelin
- Ipamorelin, the first selective growth hormone secretagogue.
Raun K, Hansen BS, Johansen NL, Thøgersen H, Madsen K, Ankersen M, Andersen PH (1998), European Journal of Endocrinology · Primary study, cell-based secretion assay with antagonist profiling
The discovery paper. It gives the sequence, the pituitary cell potency, the antagonist profiling that assigns the receptor, and the swine hormone panel that every later selectivity statement rests on. Read it for what it measured and for what it did not.
- Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach.
Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K (1999), Nature · Primary study, peptide purification and identification
The endogenous ligand, and the reason the chemistry of this compound is interesting: ghrelin needs an n-octanoyl group on serine 3 to work, and ipamorelin has nothing of the kind.
- Molecular recognition of an acyl-peptide hormone and activation of ghrelin receptor.
Wang Y, Guo S, Zhuang Y, Yun Y, Xu P, He X, Guo J, Yin W, Xu HE, Xie X, Jiang Y (2021), Nature Communications · Structure paper, cryo-electron microscopy with mutagenesis
The closest structural evidence available. Cryo-electron microscopy of the receptor with ghrelin and with the synthetic peptide GHRP-6, identifying the pocket that accepts the acyl group. It is the right paper to read precisely because it does not contain ipamorelin.
- Pharmacological characterisation of a new oral GH secretagogue, NN703.
Hansen BS, Raun K, Nielsen KK, Johansen PB, Hansen TK, Peschke B, Lau J, Andersen PH, Ankersen M (1999), European Journal of Endocrinology · Primary study, radioligand displacement and cell assays
The clearest demonstration in this series that a secretion potency and a receptor affinity are different measurements, which is what makes the missing affinity figure for ipamorelin matter.
- Analysis of new growth promoting black market products.
Krug O, Thomas A, Malerød-Fjeld H, Dehnes Y, Laussmann T, Feldmann I, Sickmann A, Thevis M (2018), Growth Hormone & IGF Research · Primary study, structural characterisation by mass spectrometry
Market-sourced material characterised by mass spectrometry, with Gly-ipamorelin confirmed against custom-synthesised reference. The practical identity paper for anything labelled with this name.
- Metabolism of growth hormone releasing peptides.
Thomas A, Delahaut P, Krug O, Schänzer W, Thevis M (2012), Analytical Chemistry · Primary study, metabolite identification by high-resolution mass spectrometry
Where the molecule goes chemically. 28 metabolites across eight peptides of this class, all from exopeptidase, amidase or endopeptidase action, which makes the C-terminal amide an enzymatic target rather than a protective cap.
- Growth hormone (GH)-independent stimulation of adiposity by GH secretagogues.
Lall S, Tung LY, Ohlsson C, Jansson JO, Dickson SL (2001), Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · Primary study, genetic model with body composition measurement
A clean experimental design: growth hormone-deficient mice separate what the receptor agonist does from what growth hormone does, and the two went in opposite directions on relative fat mass.
- Prospective, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study of the Ghrelin mimetic ipamorelin for the management of postoperative ileus in bowel resection patients.
Beck DE, Sweeney WB, McCarter MD; Ipamorelin 201 Study Group (2014), International Journal of Colorectal Disease · Randomised controlled trial
The phase 2 trial, and it has to be read twice. Its own abstract reports no significant difference from placebo on the key and secondary efficacy analyses and concludes that the compound was well tolerated. The FDA cites this same study for serious adverse events including death, which the abstract does not report, and that pair of readings is the most important thing on this page.
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of ipamorelin, a growth hormone releasing peptide, in human volunteers.
Gobburu JV, Agersø H, Jusko WJ, Ynddal L (1999), Pharmaceutical Research · Primary study, human pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
The only human kinetic data there is, and the figure worth carrying away from it: a modelled half-maximal stimulating concentration of 214 nmol/L against a 1.3 nmol/l potency in rat pituitary cells, which is the gap between a cell assay and a person.
References
- 1.Raun K, Hansen BS, Johansen NL, Thøgersen H, Madsen K, Ankersen M, Andersen PH. (1998). Ipamorelin, the first selective growth hormone secretagogue. European Journal of Endocrinology. 139:552-561. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1390552 · abstract only
- 2.PubChem. Compound Summary: CID 9831659, Ipamorelin. PubChem, National Center for Biotechnology Information. source · database record
- 3.Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. (1999). Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature. 402:656-660. doi:10.1038/45230 · abstract only
- 4.Beck DE, Sweeney WB, McCarter MD; Ipamorelin 201 Study Group. (2014). Prospective, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study of the Ghrelin mimetic ipamorelin for the management of postoperative ileus in bowel resection patients. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 29:1527-1534. doi:10.1007/s00384-014-2030-8 · abstract only
- 5.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2026). Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding that May Present Significant Safety Risks (content current as of 22 April 2026). U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Human Drug Compounding. source · full text read
- 6.Krug O, Thomas A, Malerød-Fjeld H, Dehnes Y, Laussmann T, Feldmann I, Sickmann A, Thevis M. (2018). Analysis of new growth promoting black market products. Growth Hormone & IGF Research. 41:1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ghir.2018.05.001 · abstract only
- 7.RCSB Protein Data Bank. PDB entries 7F9Z (GHRP-6-bound ghrelin receptor in complex with Gq) and 7NA8 (Structures of human ghrelin receptor-Gi complexes with ghrelin and a synthetic agonist), with a full-text archive search for ipamorelin. RCSB Protein Data Bank. source · database record
- 8.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2026). Drugs@FDA (openFDA drugsfda endpoint): approved-product active ingredient search for ipamorelin, no matches. Drugs@FDA. source · database record
- 9.European Medicines Agency. (2026). Medicines output: European public assessment reports for human and veterinary medicines (full list, JSON report). European Medicines Agency medicines database. source · database record
- 10.Health Canada. (2026). Drug Product Database: active ingredient search for ipamorelin, no records. Health Canada Drug Product Database. source · database record
- 11.U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2026). NCT00672074: Safety and Efficacy of Ipamorelin for Management of Post-Operative Ileus (phase 2, completed). ClinicalTrials.gov. source · database record
- 12.U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2026). NCT01280344: Safety and Efficacy of Ipamorelin Compared to Placebo for the Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function (phase 2, completed). ClinicalTrials.gov. source · database record
- 13.World Anti-Doping Agency. (2026). The 2026 Prohibited List: International Standard. World Anti-Doping Agency. source · full text read
- 14.Gobburu JV, Agersø H, Jusko WJ, Ynddal L. (1999). Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of ipamorelin, a growth hormone releasing peptide, in human volunteers. Pharmaceutical Research. 16:1412-1416. doi:10.1023/a:1018955126402 · abstract only
- 15.Howard AD, Feighner SD, Cully DF, Arena JP, Liberator PA, Rosenblum CI, Hamelin M, Hreniuk DL, Palyha OC, Anderson J, Paress PS, Diaz C, Chou M, Liu KK, McKee KK, Pong SS, Chaung LY, Elbrecht A, Dashkevicz M, Heavens R, Rigby M, Sirinathsinghji DJ, Dean DC, Melillo DG, Patchett AA, Nargund R, Griffin PR, DeMartino JA, Gupta SK, Schaeffer JM, Smith RG, Van der Ploeg LH. (1996). A receptor in pituitary and hypothalamus that functions in growth hormone release. Science. 273:974-977. doi:10.1126/science.273.5277.974 · abstract only
- 16.Ankersen M, Johansen NL, Madsen K, Hansen BS, Raun K, Nielsen KK, Thogersen H, Hansen TK, Peschke B, Lau J, Lundt BF, Andersen PH. (1998). A new series of highly potent growth hormone-releasing peptides derived from ipamorelin. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 41:3699-3704. doi:10.1021/jm9801962 · abstract only
- 17.Hansen TK, Ankersen M, Hansen BS, Raun K, Nielsen KK, Lau J, Peschke B, Lundt BF, Thøgersen H, Johansen NL, Madsen K, Andersen PH. (1998). Novel orally active growth hormone secretagogues. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 41:3705-3714. doi:10.1021/jm980197u · abstract only
- 18.Peschke B, Ankersen M, Bauer M, Hansen TK, Hansen BS, Nielsen KK, Raun K, Richter L, Westergaard L. (2002). The influence of conformational restriction in the C-terminus of growth hormone secretagogues on their potency. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 37:487-501. doi:10.1016/s0223-5234(02)01370-3 · abstract only
- 19.Hansen TK, Ankersen M, Raun K, Hansen BS. (2001). Highly potent growth hormone secretagogues: hybrids of NN703 and ipamorelin. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 11:1915-1918. doi:10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00345-6 · abstract only
- 20.Fowkes MM, Lalonde T, Yu L, Dhanvantari S, Kovacs MS, Luyt LG. (2018). Peptidomimetic growth hormone secretagogue derivatives for positron emission tomography imaging of the ghrelin receptor. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 157:1500-1511. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.08.062 · abstract only
- 21.Worm DJ, Els-Heindl S, Kellert M, Kuhnert R, Saretz S, Koebberling J, Riedl B, Hey-Hawkins E, Beck-Sickinger AG. (2018). A stable meta-carborane enables the generation of boron-rich peptide agonists targeting the ghrelin receptor. Journal of Peptide Science. 24:e3119. doi:10.1002/psc.3119 · abstract only
- 22.Gajda PM, Holm NB, Hoej LJ, Rasmussen BS, Dalsgaard PW, Reitzel LA, Linnet K. (2019). Glycine-modified growth hormone secretagogues identified in seized doping material. Drug Testing and Analysis. 11:350-354. doi:10.1002/dta.2489 · abstract only
- 23.Ferro P, Krotov G, Zvereva I, Rodchenkov G, Segura J. (2017). Structure-activity relationship for peptídic growth hormone secretagogues. Drug Testing and Analysis. 9:87-95. doi:10.1002/dta.1947 · abstract only
- 24.Matsumoto M, Kitajima Y, Iwanami T, Hayashi Y, Tanaka S, Minamitake Y, Hosoda H, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. (2001). Structural similarity of ghrelin derivatives to peptidyl growth hormone secretagogues. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 284:655-659. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.5014 · abstract only
- 25.Wang Y, Guo S, Zhuang Y, Yun Y, Xu P, He X, Guo J, Yin W, Xu HE, Xie X, Jiang Y. (2021). Molecular recognition of an acyl-peptide hormone and activation of ghrelin receptor. Nature Communications. 12:5064. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25364-2 · abstract only
- 26.Liu H, Sun D, Myasnikov A, Damian M, Baneres JL, Sun J, Zhang C. (2021). Structural basis of human ghrelin receptor signaling by ghrelin and the synthetic agonist [an orally active, non-peptide ghrelin-receptor agonist]. Nature Communications. 12:6410. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26735-5 · abstract only
- 27.Chan CB, Fung CK, Fung W, Tse MC, Cheng CH. (2004). Stimulation of growth hormone secretion from seabream pituitary cells in primary culture by growth hormone secretagogues is independent of growth hormone transcription. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 139:77-85. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2004.09.008 · abstract only
- 28.Lu Z, Ngan MP, Liu JYH, Yang L, Tu L, Chan SW, Giuliano C, Lovati E, Pietra C, Rudd JA. (2024). The growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a agonists, anamorelin and ipamorelin, inhibit cisplatin-induced weight loss in ferrets: Anamorelin also exhibits anti-emetic effects via a central mechanism. Physiology & Behavior. 284:114644. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114644 · abstract only
- 29.N Mohammadi E, Louwies T, Pietra C, Northrup SR, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B. (2020). Attenuation of Visceral and Somatic Nociception by Ghrelin Mimetics. Journal of Experimental Pharmacology. 12:267-274. doi:10.2147/JEP.S249747 · abstract only
- 30.Lall S, Tung LY, Ohlsson C, Jansson JO, Dickson SL. (2001). Growth hormone (GH)-independent stimulation of adiposity by GH secretagogues. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 280:132-138. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2000.4065 · abstract only
- 31.Thomas A, Delahaut P, Krug O, Schänzer W, Thevis M. (2012). Metabolism of growth hormone releasing peptides. Analytical Chemistry. 84:10252-10259. doi:10.1021/ac302034w · abstract only
- 32.Semenistaya E, Zvereva I, Thomas A, Thevis M, Krotov G, Rodchenkov G. (2015). Determination of growth hormone releasing peptides metabolites in human urine after nasal administration of GHRP-1, GHRP-2, GHRP-6, Hexarelin, and Ipamorelin. Drug Testing and Analysis. 7:919-925. doi:10.1002/dta.1787 · abstract only
- 33.UniProt Consortium. UniProtKB Q92847 (GHSR_HUMAN), Growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1. UniProt Knowledgebase. source · database record
- 34.Ahnfelt-Rønne I, Nowak J, Olsen UB. (2001). Do growth hormone-releasing peptides act as ghrelin secretagogues?. Endocrine. 14:133-135. doi:10.1385/ENDO:14:1:133 · abstract only
- 35.Greenwood-Van Meerveld B, Tyler K, Mohammadi E, Pietra C. (2012). Efficacy of ipamorelin, a ghrelin mimetic, on gastric dysmotility in a rodent model of postoperative ileus. Journal of Experimental Pharmacology. 4:149-155. doi:10.2147/JEP.S35396 · abstract only
- 36.Adeghate E, Ponery AS. (2004). Mechanism of ipamorelin-evoked insulin release from the pancreas of normal and diabetic rats. Neuro Endocrinology Letters. 25:403-406. PMID 15665799 · abstract only
- 37.Hansen BS, Raun K, Nielsen KK, Johansen PB, Hansen TK, Peschke B, Lau J, Andersen PH, Ankersen M. (1999). Pharmacological characterisation of a new oral GH secretagogue, NN703. European Journal of Endocrinology. 141:180-189. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1410180 · abstract only
- 38.Svensson J, Lall S, Dickson SL, Bengtsson BA, Rømer J, Ahnfelt-Rønne I, Ohlsson C, Jansson JO. (2000). The GH secretagogues ipamorelin and GH-releasing peptide-6 increase bone mineral content in adult female rats. Journal of Endocrinology. 165:569-577. doi:10.1677/joe.0.1650569 · abstract only
- 39.Jiménez-Reina L, Cañete R, de la Torre MJ, Bernal G. (2002). Influence of chronic treatment with the growth hormone secretagogue Ipamorelin, in young female rats: somatotroph response in vitro. Histology and Histopathology. 17:707-714. doi:10.14670/HH-17.707 · abstract only
- 40.PubChem. Compound Summaries: CID 172641488, CID 49846970 (Ipamorelin acetate) and CID 171378556. PubChem, National Center for Biotechnology Information. source · database record
- 41.Gouda M, Ganesh CB. (2024). The influence of ghrelin agonist ipamorelin acetate on the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis in a cichlid fish, Oreochromis mossambicus. Animal Reproduction Science. 268:107550. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107550 · abstract only
- 42.Thomas A, Höppner S, Geyer H, Schänzer W, Petrou M, Kwiatkowska D, Pokrywka A, Thevis M. (2011). Determination of growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRP) and their major metabolites in human urine for doping controls by means of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 401:507-516. doi:10.1007/s00216-011-4702-3 · abstract only
- 43.Johansen PB, Hansen KT, Andersen JV, Johansen NL. (1998). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of ipamorelin and other peptidyl growth hormone secretagogues with emphasis on nasal absorption. Xenobiotica. 28:1083-1092. doi:10.1080/004982598238976 · abstract only
- 44.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Global Substance Registration System substance record, Ipamorelin, UNII Y9M3S784Z6. FDA Global Substance Registration System (GSRS). source · database record
- 45.PubChem. Compound Summary: CID 20754357. PubChem, National Center for Biotechnology Information. source · database record
